There are no negotiations which will result in peace from any sort of actual Islamist regime. The goal of Islam is to bring all nations under submission to Allah, that's what Islam *means* - submission. They intend to bring the whole world into submission to their law - shari'a. I've known Muslims, and if you get to know them, they'll tell you that directly - one in my old research group, whose father bought his wife from her father at the age of six weeks, whom he met for the first time on their wedding night, when her submission was transferred from her father to him, by the marriage contract. The price paid was one hundred ounces of gold, one new car, and assorted camels, goats, and household goods - at the time, her future husband was two months old. He owned everything she had - and her children - and could divorce her by saying "I divorce thee" three times in the presence of two male Muslim witnesses, at which point she would go back to her father's house and he could do with her as he pleased - which might result in a quick death. If you think this is a favorable state of affairs, consider that you can forget about having dogs for pets - they're as haram as pigs, listening to music or even worse, making it, drinking any sort of alcohol in public including beer - a friend in Saudi got 1000 lashes with a cane for stepping out of his house with a beer - and so on. Doing haram - forbidden - things gets you swift and severe punishment. Of course, they'd prefer your submission to be peaceful, but if not, well then, it's war, but submission (or your death) is the intended final result. That's the choice, so far as Islam is concerned, there's no treaty with infidels which will be honored, it's only a step on the road to absolute surrender - submission. Dar ul-Islam - the land of Islam - or Dar ul-Harb - the land of War - that's the choice. Letting an Islamic regime have nuclear weapons in light of that will answer your question - "then what?".
You mean like "Islamic Regime" Pakistan, who possessed nuclear weapons and has had innumerable border provocations, skirmishes and just recently traded shots with India, yet has not once deployed them?
Having a nuclear imbalance of power with Bagel Land having their secret nuclear weapons and the rest of the region defenseless from their aggression and Israel's Big American Bully's bombs- because of that fact it means I truly hope Iran gets their own nuclear deterrent, because that means Israel and America can no longer drop bombs whenever and wherever they please and destabilize that cursed land now and forever. A nuclear armed Iran is a permanent block to American meddling and Israeli bloodlust. A nuclear armed Iran must be treated with respect, and being treated with respect means that it also will begin to recognize that it is part of the Big Boy Club, and will act accordingly.
Even those dipshits in North Korea quite well understood that a nuclear weapon makes you Invasion Proof and immune to playing America's favorite game- Who Wants To Be Bombed? They did not immediately turn Tokyo into the third Japanese city to get nuked.
No, I went to the University of Invading Iraq class of 2003, courtesy that dimwitted George Bush's lie about weapons of mass destruction, so pardon me for not believing your Chicken Little predictions on the Iranian Devil this time around. Go peddle your Hannity level propaganda to Normies.
To be fair, previous administrations bumbled around indecisively, afraid of multitudes of "then whats" . . . and, thus paralyzed, allowed the situation to get worse and worse till here we are
I think you're leaving out the baneful influence of the Neo-Trots and other warmongers. They've been running US foreign policy for decades, and they just don't care about "then what."
The only people this truly effects are the Iranian and American citizens. The results will come crashing down on us while the rest of these people cash in on their defence stocks.
There are no negotiations which will result in peace from any sort of actual Islamist regime. The goal of Islam is to bring all nations under submission to Allah, that's what Islam *means* - submission. They intend to bring the whole world into submission to their law - shari'a. I've known Muslims, and if you get to know them, they'll tell you that directly - one in my old research group, whose father bought his wife from her father at the age of six weeks, whom he met for the first time on their wedding night, when her submission was transferred from her father to him, by the marriage contract. The price paid was one hundred ounces of gold, one new car, and assorted camels, goats, and household goods - at the time, her future husband was two months old. He owned everything she had - and her children - and could divorce her by saying "I divorce thee" three times in the presence of two male Muslim witnesses, at which point she would go back to her father's house and he could do with her as he pleased - which might result in a quick death. If you think this is a favorable state of affairs, consider that you can forget about having dogs for pets - they're as haram as pigs, listening to music or even worse, making it, drinking any sort of alcohol in public including beer - a friend in Saudi got 1000 lashes with a cane for stepping out of his house with a beer - and so on. Doing haram - forbidden - things gets you swift and severe punishment. Of course, they'd prefer your submission to be peaceful, but if not, well then, it's war, but submission (or your death) is the intended final result. That's the choice, so far as Islam is concerned, there's no treaty with infidels which will be honored, it's only a step on the road to absolute surrender - submission. Dar ul-Islam - the land of Islam - or Dar ul-Harb - the land of War - that's the choice. Letting an Islamic regime have nuclear weapons in light of that will answer your question - "then what?".
You mean like "Islamic Regime" Pakistan, who possessed nuclear weapons and has had innumerable border provocations, skirmishes and just recently traded shots with India, yet has not once deployed them?
Having a nuclear imbalance of power with Bagel Land having their secret nuclear weapons and the rest of the region defenseless from their aggression and Israel's Big American Bully's bombs- because of that fact it means I truly hope Iran gets their own nuclear deterrent, because that means Israel and America can no longer drop bombs whenever and wherever they please and destabilize that cursed land now and forever. A nuclear armed Iran is a permanent block to American meddling and Israeli bloodlust. A nuclear armed Iran must be treated with respect, and being treated with respect means that it also will begin to recognize that it is part of the Big Boy Club, and will act accordingly.
Even those dipshits in North Korea quite well understood that a nuclear weapon makes you Invasion Proof and immune to playing America's favorite game- Who Wants To Be Bombed? They did not immediately turn Tokyo into the third Japanese city to get nuked.
"being treated with respect means that it also will begin to recognize that it is part of the Big Boy Club, and will act accordingly" LOL, what school did you study at in Moscow, again? The one specializing in foreign relations? Pakistan is a bit different from Iran, you can figure this out if you read Dawn - https://www.dawn.com/live/israel-iran-conflict#1919483 and https://www.dawn.com/live/israel-iran-conflict#1919482 and https://www.dawn.com/live/israel-iran-conflict#1919468 - and so is the UAE. And I don't think they play cricket in Iran - https://www.dawn.com/news/1919294/bumrah-and-brook-shine-before-rahul-edges-india-ahead-in-first-test
No, I went to the University of Invading Iraq class of 2003, courtesy that dimwitted George Bush's lie about weapons of mass destruction, so pardon me for not believing your Chicken Little predictions on the Iranian Devil this time around. Go peddle your Hannity level propaganda to Normies.
Bleak but fair.
To be fair, previous administrations bumbled around indecisively, afraid of multitudes of "then whats" . . . and, thus paralyzed, allowed the situation to get worse and worse till here we are
I think you're leaving out the baneful influence of the Neo-Trots and other warmongers. They've been running US foreign policy for decades, and they just don't care about "then what."
dumb analysis, sorry. The BBB will pass Senate around July 4th
Then what? The Monday morning quarterbacks do their he should'as & we could'as.
Me? Another cup of coffee and sitback enjoying the circus.
The only people this truly effects are the Iranian and American citizens. The results will come crashing down on us while the rest of these people cash in on their defence stocks.
Then what? Like clockwork, a mountain of unintended consequences hits the beaches. Rinse and repeat the endless mistakes of the last 5,000 years.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/iran-reportedly-moves-to-close-strait-of-hormuz-after-us-attacks/ar-AA1HcsW4?ocid=BingNewsSerp