Enoch Powell was generally right about the effect of mass immigration on Britain…unfortunately, he made a fundamental error in vastly overestimating the capacity of the English and Scots to get up off their bums, out of the local, and actually do anything about the invasion their betters were inflicting upon them.
Apartheid was a system South Africa introduced in order not to allow a general one-man one-vote (OMOV) system while black labor was an essential economic component of the republic.
However, if we go back to the English parliamentary system from 1630 till 1920x it wasn't a one-man one-vote system either. And key people like Oliver Cromwell (I think his statue is still in front of the Westminster parliament) were at the forefront of keeping it this way versus the Levellers after the English Civil War...
In England there was a stringent, wealth-defined binary franchise, and some boroughs because of that had no eligible voters - they were called rotten boroughs, lol. In Ireland, franchise also had a religious connotation - most (or almost all?) voters were Protestant. So was there a socio-religious Apartheid in England then?
The binary, wealth-defined franchise system even extended to big parts of early USA, particularly the southern states. Other countries like Prussia has a general franchise but had it torqued by a selective weighting of votes - in Prussia they used a tricameral voting system, where voters responsible for the top 1/3 of tax revenue were given 1/3 of all vote weight. So if democracy based on OMOV system is not working, and "we" still want to maintain an electoral system, we'll probably go back to a wealth-defined (ie tax revenue-defined) franchise system again.
The UK situation is more complex than that. The two tier law stuff came from a woke group that was given the responsibility to set sentencing "guidelines". Even Two Tier Kier could see how this would go down with the public and panic ensued. The mad judges eventually backed down when threatened with emergency legislation but they'll probably be back.
The sentencing guidelines were just a formalization of the judicial branch's already-operational two-tier system that protects non-Whites who commit serious offenses while punishing Whites for utterly imaginary ones.
The judiciary is 'woke'.
All sensible countries are going to have to defund their judiciary and establish people's tribunals in order to get back on track.
America has its gated communities, and the ruling class is not bound by nationality example corporations manufacturing on a global chessboard, searching for the cheapest labor and the highest priced markets
Hopefully the Trump Administration and/or our better oligarchs funds nationalist and anti-immigration organizations across Europe, sort of like USAID only more subtle and actually committed to preserving Western civilization. They obviously have far fewer resources and money than nationalist American groups, and are going to need sustained support against the authoritarian measures that are being used against them - and which will get worse.
I don't know if there are enough Euros with the fighting spirit left to pull it off - possibly too large of a share of their ancestors with that instinct were killed off in the 20th century. But it's hard to watch from afar as countries that were the home of my ancestors are degraded by mass 3rd world immigration and leaders that have zero loyalty to their historic peoples.
Enoch Powell was generally right about the effect of mass immigration on Britain…unfortunately, he made a fundamental error in vastly overestimating the capacity of the English and Scots to get up off their bums, out of the local, and actually do anything about the invasion their betters were inflicting upon them.
Apartheid was a system South Africa introduced in order not to allow a general one-man one-vote (OMOV) system while black labor was an essential economic component of the republic.
However, if we go back to the English parliamentary system from 1630 till 1920x it wasn't a one-man one-vote system either. And key people like Oliver Cromwell (I think his statue is still in front of the Westminster parliament) were at the forefront of keeping it this way versus the Levellers after the English Civil War...
In England there was a stringent, wealth-defined binary franchise, and some boroughs because of that had no eligible voters - they were called rotten boroughs, lol. In Ireland, franchise also had a religious connotation - most (or almost all?) voters were Protestant. So was there a socio-religious Apartheid in England then?
The binary, wealth-defined franchise system even extended to big parts of early USA, particularly the southern states. Other countries like Prussia has a general franchise but had it torqued by a selective weighting of votes - in Prussia they used a tricameral voting system, where voters responsible for the top 1/3 of tax revenue were given 1/3 of all vote weight. So if democracy based on OMOV system is not working, and "we" still want to maintain an electoral system, we'll probably go back to a wealth-defined (ie tax revenue-defined) franchise system again.
The UK situation is more complex than that. The two tier law stuff came from a woke group that was given the responsibility to set sentencing "guidelines". Even Two Tier Kier could see how this would go down with the public and panic ensued. The mad judges eventually backed down when threatened with emergency legislation but they'll probably be back.
The sentencing guidelines were just a formalization of the judicial branch's already-operational two-tier system that protects non-Whites who commit serious offenses while punishing Whites for utterly imaginary ones.
The judiciary is 'woke'.
All sensible countries are going to have to defund their judiciary and establish people's tribunals in order to get back on track.
America has its gated communities, and the ruling class is not bound by nationality example corporations manufacturing on a global chessboard, searching for the cheapest labor and the highest priced markets
Hopefully the Trump Administration and/or our better oligarchs funds nationalist and anti-immigration organizations across Europe, sort of like USAID only more subtle and actually committed to preserving Western civilization. They obviously have far fewer resources and money than nationalist American groups, and are going to need sustained support against the authoritarian measures that are being used against them - and which will get worse.
I don't know if there are enough Euros with the fighting spirit left to pull it off - possibly too large of a share of their ancestors with that instinct were killed off in the 20th century. But it's hard to watch from afar as countries that were the home of my ancestors are degraded by mass 3rd world immigration and leaders that have zero loyalty to their historic peoples.